Eu4 ideal army composition.

A combat width's worth of artillery, and then the same of infantry with 4-6 cavalry for flanking as well. This is the ideal composition, but in many situations you won't be able to either field this many troops (due to the expensiveness of artillery and its relative weakness earlier in the game) or have a province with a high enough supply limit to park them.Less short answer: To optimize your army composition get as many infantry and cavalry to fill your front line first, around 4 cav is fine, this number increases with greater flanking range. Get lots of cannons starting from tech 16, at the very least 1/3 of your army, closer to 1/2 your army.However, most people will pick one of two sides: never buy cavalry or always have at least [2 or 4]. Whichever side you choose, know that there are people out there adamant that you are wrong. I have written below for the OPTIMAL army composition. Which ignores the main reason cavalry detractors refuse to use cavalry (waste of money). So...Ideal Army composition for Russia? I'm playing Extended Timeline, using 50.000-men stacks, on the 2010s.You always can make use of more money in EU4. Saving money on cavalry means spending more on soldier households for examlpe which dramatically reduce or eliminat the need for any manpower savings that cavalry offer. Lets say for example that with a 100 force limit, you use about 25 cavalry.

İlk olarak Svenska Lejonet tarafından gönderildi: Before tech 16 don't take arty, or take it for sieging only. Overally before tech 16 your armies should be full infantry and 4-6 cav. After tech 16, the Inf-Arty ratio shoudl be 1:1 for maximizing the damage.Balanced Army Composition: Ensure that your army has a good balance of infantry, cavalry, and artillery (once available). This will make your forces more effective in various combat scenarios. ... What are The Best Idea Groups for Denmark in EU4? In Europa Universalis IV, Denmark’s strategic position and unique circumstances make …

Tech 1-16: 4 cavalry and the rest of combat width of infantry. Tech 7: add at least 1 cannon to the fighting stack, to get +1 at siege. You may additionally make 10/0/10 siege stack, not for fighting and just for fast siege of forts level 1-3, since they are the most common. 10 infantry may be replaced with 10-16 infantry mercenaries.Your army is therefore significantly better than the enemy army, which is why you win so handily.) You said that 90% of the casualties are caused by artillery, which means that if two otherwise-identical armies meet then 90% of the damage is inflicted by the artillery in each army. This is substantially different to the artillery vs no ...

Go to eu4 r/eu4. r/eu4. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the grand strategy game Europa Universalis IV by Paradox Development Studio. ... But i have a question about the ideal army composition for sweden (both early and lategame) and what ideas i should take. And also is there any other way to get the vasa dynasty than ...I have a question about army composition, specifically on Combat Width. Currently, my understanding is that I should always have an amount of infantry+ cavalry (in my case, I rarely have more than 4 cav) as high as the combat width, to make sure artillery lines are always 'covered'. So with a 24 width my composition would be 20+4, etc.They are simply too pricy and not worth it, unless the situation is dire in the lategame and you need a 10/4/10 stack to win the war ASAP. If you do that, I suggest you delete everything but infantry once you are done, because again, it is most likely going to be a huge strain on your economy. For army compositions, refer to a spreadsheet ...This is a bad army composition as all of your cannons will be on the front row, where they take a lot of damage. Personally if I had a 20 stack I'd go for 16 infantry and 4 cavalry, no cannons assuming I'm going up against another similarly sized or larger army. If they were smaller, then cannons could sit safely on the second row.That guide is pretty good, there's a lazy mans variant though which is slightly more fiddly in battle but less attrition and ideal for splitting for rebel suppression. Start: 18/2/0 (16/4 if your tech / ideas has good cav) Tech 7: 17/2/1 (15/4/1 if good cav, 1 artillery for sieges mostly so can be in a dedicated army)

Lipsey logistics reviews

army comp depends on your mil tech. generally you should aim to fill the frontrow with and have 2-6 cav for flanking purposes. after MIL13 you should start incorporating some cannons for the backrow. before that they dont really do much and you'll lose more due to attrition.

🙈 Among the superpowers people want, a Harry Potter-style invisibility cloak generally comes pretty high on the list. Now even the US Army wants one for its soldiers. They are loo...The question is, which should be the first 2 Military Ideas that Austria chooses? I ended an Austria game with Quantity (first), Defensive (second), Aristocratic (third), and Quality (fourth). I had absolutely amazing generals with the -1% army tradition decay from Aristocratic idea, the +2% army tradition from Defensive and Quality, and the ...However, if you want to optimize for combat strength, optimal army composition is always, i.e. from the start of the game, a full back row of artillery, as much cavalry as your ratio can afford and the rest infantry, obviously modified to account for any casualties. Before tech 13/16, however, such a composition is grossly cost-ineffective.323K subscribers in the eu4 community. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the grand strategy game Europa Universalis IV by…In sports, body composition refers to the overall weight and size of an athlete and the proportion of that weight made up of muscle, fat or bone. Body composition is important in n...Horde army compositions. goodwill5000. Dec 9, 2020. Jump to latest Follow Reply. Hey, first time posting here in a while. I just started playing as Oirat and have formed Yuan and I'm on military tech ten.

In fact it was SO powerful in EU3, that it got seriously nerfed in EU4: You can only use 1/2 of the squares behind your frontline units and ART takes double damage when fighting in the first row (not sure if that is documented anywhere, though). The ideal army composition is 2 CAV (for the flanks) + 50% ART + 50% INF.Balanced Army Composition: Ensure that your army has a good balance of infantry, cavalry, and artillery (once available). This will make your forces more effective in various combat scenarios. ... What are The Best Idea Groups for Denmark in EU4? In Europa Universalis IV, Denmark’s strategic position and unique circumstances make …What I usually do is have as many cannons as it takes for the full +5 to sieging and have the same number of infantry. That's what I consider 1 army. I'll have those armies working in teams of two. Regardless of how you do it always have a full back line of cannons. Replace the cav with more infantry. I have 40 combat width, does that mean it ...The Shanghai Composite Index tracks the biggest and most important public companies in China. The Shanghai Composite Index tracks the biggest and most important public companies in...Tech 7: add at least 1 cannon to the fighting stack, to get +1 at siege. You may additionally make 10/0/10 siege stack, not for fighting and just for fast siege of forts level 1-3, since they are the most common. 10 infantry may be replaced with 10-16 infantry mercenaries. Tech 16 (latest tech 22): delete cavalry and fill your army with combat ...Importance of Artillery. There's a couple of main factors in combat in Victoria II. First of all, artillery is very powerful in terms of damage, but is easier to kill than infantry. So you want as much artillery as possible in a stack, while having an equal number of units in the front line of battle so your artillery is not exposed.Optimal damage-maximizing composition is based on the Combat Width (CW) value. The ideal scenario is having the full CW value worth of artillery (back row) and the CW value worth of infantry, minus X number of cav regiments. X is the (flanking range of cavalry)*2, one set of full flanking range cav on each flank.

This is the perfect army composition when you want to win a battle and are not constrained by force limit, money, manpower, attrition and other stuff that you might want to do with the army (sieging). So while the spreadsheet is not wrong, it is impractical for …However, if you want to optimize for combat strength, optimal army composition is always, i.e. from the start of the game, a full back row of artillery, as much cavalry as your ratio can afford and the rest infantry, obviously modified to account for any casualties. Before tech 13/16, however, such a composition is grossly cost-ineffective.

I've always wondered which composition of my army would be optimal. Most of the time I used 2:1:1 or 3:1:2, but have never been really certain if this was optimal. You surely know the wiki-charts showing how unit-pips increase for each tech-group and that there are several steps shifting the effectiveness of units from infantry to cavalry and back.Matthew Flores. In EU4, army composition is crucial for achieving victory on the battlefield. In this guide, we will reveal the best army compositions for different …If you're at 63% Cavalry Combat Bonus that means that you're infantry has 20% Infantry Combat Bonus (Piechota Wybraniecka & Quality Ideas), what if I go half and half with a full combat width of Artillery. 63% Cavalry Combat Ability seems like it would chew through their flanks in no time. I use 8:8:8.The "Ideal" army composistion late game is enough cannons to fill the back row, so whatever your combat width is. Then 6 or 4 calvary units for flanking attacks, then just infantry afterwards. For a 30 stack, I normally will run 16-4-10. Reply.Ideal army composition and unit types in eu4 - Sheet 1. If you find yourself to be a horde you may want to ignore all this and... View more. Course. educativo (análisis) …Bear in mind, that's Ideal composition mathematically. It doesn't account for cost, supply limit, or the need to reinforce, so take it as a guideline. It doesn't account for cost, supply limit, or the need to reinforce, so take it as a guideline.Cavalry gets massive bonus at tech 17 and 23 respectively, which almost universally makes it a tolerable alternative to infantry. At techs 6/7 infantry has 25% higher base damage output, probably closer to 27-30% in practice. Not sure if there's any tech group where pip differences would offset this. 1.Tech 7: add at least 1 cannon to the fighting stack, to get +1 at siege. You may additionally make 10/0/10 siege stack, not for fighting and just for fast siege of forts level 1-3, since they are the most common. 10 infantry may be replaced with 10-16 infantry mercenaries. Tech 16 (latest tech 22): delete cavalry and fill your army with combat ...

Dalton zetwick hastings mn

the army composition depends on your tech level. early on you should go for ~60-70% inf + rest cavalry, as soon as you get cannons add ONE or TWO to the stack. start going towards your compositon after MIL 13 or so. (slowly, no need to reach that army composition before MIL 16 at least)

Your army is therefore significantly better than the enemy army, which is why you win so handily.) You said that 90% of the casualties are caused by artillery, which means that if two otherwise-identical armies meet then 90% of the damage is inflicted by the artillery in each army. This is substantially different to the artillery vs no ...Thanks for the replies everyone. Can't say I'm certain what composition I'm more comfortable with. I liked the 3/1/2 because of the aforementioned carpet sieging as well as the plentiful number of infantry compared to cavalry; I tend to be quite paranoid about running the risk of having too few infantry to support my cavalry after particularly heavy battles, and I also often like to construct ...It's accurate to have wastelands in these provinces for balance, but also 2 other reasons: 1: They were isolated, 'undiscovered' or otherwise inaccesible well into the 19th century, it would be ahistorical for them to be provinces. 2: Technology didn't allow these areas to be colonised. Railways and steam vessels were a major development that ...Recruiting w/e banner they throw you at and use the excess ones at looting/carpet siege/colony native uprising. Of course, if you don't spend time genociding and developing the Manchu culture area growing your banner population as Confucian Qing, your banner sizes won't grow between the banner idea unlock and the 50% banner age ability in Age ...Everytime when the supply increased in the territory where you stationing your army with +10 so basicly 30->40 supply with you put 5 more inf and 5 more art in it. This tactic was good for me. I always use this, normaly i end up with with army korps looks like: 25 inf 5 or sometimes 10 cav and 25 artillery.This eu4 army composition 2020 can be an eu4 tutorial for beginners, as it explains everything step by step, better than most eu4 guides or eu4 tutorials. The EU4 1.30 Emperor DLC adds a lot of flavor and new mechanics to the game, such as the new eu4 1.30 mercenary or eu4 1.30 mercenaries rework, eu4 1.30 catholic faith reword, eu4 …There is no 'ideal' composition. There are good ones. Start with a general, always make sure you have a general. Make your army big. Bigger armies are less likely to be engaged and less likely to lose. Start with infantry. Up to full combat width or force limit, whichever comes first. When cannons come along get at least 5, 6 is better and 10 ...13K. 450K views 2 years ago EU4 Mechanics Guides. An EU4 Army Composition Guide focusing on the best army composition that europa universalis 4 has to offer. Both a great army...A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the grand strategy game Europa Universalis IV by Paradox Development Studio. Members Online Am I the only one annoyed by the fact that level 2 and 3 advisors could cost as much as an entire army's maintenance

However, if you want to optimize for combat strength, optimal army composition is always, i.e. from the start of the game, a full back row of artillery, as much cavalry as your ratio can afford and the rest infantry, obviously modified to account for any casualties. Before tech 13/16, however, such a composition is grossly cost-ineffective.Ideal Army composition for Russia? I'm playing Extended Timeline, using 50.000-men stacks, on the 2010s.But after 1.33 the composition doesn't seem to work as good as before. I barely win any fights and in most of my fights it seems like I'm starting with half the morale of my enemy. I've read the dev diaries and if I understand it correctly, the combat changes make filling up combat width more important than it was before the update.Edit: So from what I read the ideal composition should be 16 inf, 4 cav, 20 arty. 4 cavalry because more is useless, infantry to fill the numbers and 20 artillery because you have to have the same number of arty and frontline units for balanced damage and morale. Archived post. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. 5. 24 Share.Instagram:https://instagram. party city fairless hills Altogether you can get 30-40% army maintenance reduction with an optional 20% using war taxes, combined with -20% regiment costs (which also reduces maintenance multiplicatively) and -30-40% cavalry cost. With aristocratic, full cossack loyalty, Polish ideas, and the regiment reduction from quantity, you can get cavalry down to 10g each, the ... grayling michigan craigslist In my opinion the best composition is army width - 2 * Inf, 2 Cav, and army width/amount required for max bonus on forts Art. Always have at least 1 Art, because it greatly increases your chances of breaching the walls during sieges. rubmap login If memory serves right, in 1650 your combat width should be around 32. So a good army composition might be 32 front row infantry + 8 spare units = 40 infantry and 21 artillery to get the maximum siege bonus on a star fort capital (level 6 + 1). You can go all the way up to 32 artillery, if you can afford that. tea released staar test Another Ming Guide 1.31. Tip. I am writing this guide to offer advanced tips on MING for EU4 ver 1.31 Ironman Normal Difficulty. This requires DLC but I can't say exactly which; I have all of them except Leviathan. This guide is micro-management intensive; lots of pausing on key dates. You do not <i>have</i> to be so exact but this write-up ... the artist tree fresno Not sure what the best setup would be though. Too much cavalry. You can only support a 50% cav to inf ratio, and you will lose way more infantry than cavalry in battle, so you'll be under that threshold instantly. 20 is too small a stack anyway. Most people go with something like 12-14 inf, 4 cav, 10-12 art.Heavies take up 3 width, galleys 0.33, and light ships 1. Heavies offer the most punch per naval force limit; galleys in inland seas are most efficient per engagement width. So optimize according to your constraints and where you'd need to fight (Baltic Sea is inland, but if you venture into the North Sea it's not); most likely with heavies. asian market in honolulu hi Horde idea, so you can hit 5 ducat cavalries, making your cavalries cheaper and hit harder than your infantries. Then only use cavalries at this point. This allows a much bigger skill cushion for the new horde players, as your armies hit harder causing more stack wipes and fewer casualties, and your economy can easily sustain your troops ... gmail google cps Search Results related to eu4 military doctrines and organization on Search EngineRoughly meaning you could see a horde army beat a western army 2-3 times its size. As western army as you can see has the same 3 pips on its cavalry and infantry at levels 5-8 and only half the army can be cavalry. In theory a 50/50 infantry/cavalry army would be the best choice. However it's much more expensive and not all that more effective.Whatever your naval combat width is divided by three in heavies, with an additional heavy per admiral maneuver is the ideal naval stack. Heavies will win against galleys with the same combat width's worth due to the penalty to morale when losing ships, but it isn't cost-effective. Your entire combat width filled with galleys is the ideal galley ... morgue lever bg3 A transport stack with many ships as your standard army composition (i.e. my standard stack in late game is 25-6-25 so i make a 56 transport stack plus 10-20 heavies for escort) a hundred galleys parked right before gibaltair if you're playing in mediterran, same for the baltic don eckles net worth WeaponFocusFace. •. Before you have 100% cav to inf ratio, use primarily infantry with 4 cav for flanking like every other nation. Even when you get to 75% ratio, it's not a good idea to put that much cav into your armies, because your infantry gets put in the center of any battle you fight and therefore dies first and dies more than cav. craigslist apartments for rent syracuse new york Policies are a set of bonuses unlocked by completing idea groups.Each possible pair of ideas from different types (i.e. administrative and diplomatic, administrative and military, or diplomatic and military) unlocks a policy. Since there are 7 administrative, 7 diplomatic, and 11 military idea groups, there are 7 * 7 + 7 * 11 + 7 * 11 = 203 different … shibagt discord Quantity is greatly overshadowed compared to quality when it comes to navies. In naval battles, quality is more decisive than for land. A properly specced naval power can defeat 100s of excess heavies. Recruit the best admiral you can (so bank as much navy tradition as possible). Grab every naval modifier.From a purely theoretical position when considering army composition to win battles, the first point to understand is it varies over the course of the game. Cannons are initially useless at combat. Cavalry are always devastating if you can achieve flanking, and in the early game (tech <6) they are far superior at dealing damage.Go to eu4 r/eu4. r/eu4. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the grand strategy game Europa Universalis IV by Paradox Development Studio. ... Army composition . Advice Wanted Ive got the basics of the game down pretty good but something thats always seemed ambiguous to me is how combat width works and how my armies should ...